Community shows signs of life! Come on, Hulu! Maybe it won’t be cancelled! Could we have 13 more episodes of one of the
best shows on TV? Let’s celebrate!
Oh, what’s that you say, nation’s online TV critics? You don’t want Community to be revived?
Well, you must have never liked the show in the first place. Wait, what?
You did like it, and still like it?
Yet you’re happy with its cancellation?
I’m confused.
Let’s start with Todd:
The show had a tremendous run: Community
made
it to five seasons and ran 97 episodes, far more than the vast majority of TV
shows ever have.
It’s also funnier than the vast
majority of TV shows. 97 episodes, a lot
of them pretty fucking good. Let’s have
thirteen more!
It
had, by any stretch of the imagination, a terrific run, particularly when one
considers how close it came to cancellation so many times. Is it really worth
potentially sullying that reputation for a handful of additional episodes,
Um—that last season was kind of good,
wasn’t it? So, odds are, a potential
next season would be good too. And if
it’s not, oh well—maybe we get one or two more great episodes—no harm in that!
I sense a creeping Victorianism in Todd’s worldview
today—“sullying reputations”—never want to do that. Keep that chastity belt on, Community!
particularly
when it could be fun to see all involved stretch their wings?
Little birds, leave your nests! Fly, fly, fledglings! Your home is in a newer, probably worse nest!
Will
I watch more episodes of Community if they come along? Undoubtedly.
Will I continue to write like Donald
Rumsfeld? Indubitably.
And
I’ll likely enjoy them, too.
So, of course, you’re happy that Community is over. That makes sense. Todd’s asceticism is stronger than ever. Enjoyment? Pleasure?
Fie! Fie on that!
But
everything—even TV shows—has to end, and Community is at a point where
its legacy is secure. Why mess with that?
Maybe because it’s still really fucking good? Sure, TV shows have to end. Maybe for, you know, TV shows that actually
make you laugh, they could end when the creators and stars want them to end or
when they get bad. That has not happened
with Community. But Todd “Chopping Block” Van DerWerff wants
us to think of the children. He’s so
concerned with the “legacy.” You’re not
trying to get your kid into Yale, Todd.
To steal from a friend, here’s basically Todd’s argument,
transposed into another context:
Ya know, Lebron is great, but I think I'm ready for him
to retire. I'm not really sure there's anything else he can show me at this
point. He's a great, great basketball player, sure, but we've seen what he has
to offer already. He doesn't want to linger just for the sake of it, like
Jordan did with those pointless final three championships.
Also, Michael Jordan kind of did stick around too long
with that ill-fated Wizards comeback.
Did that destroy his legacy? Not
exactly.
Could
Sony get more Community on the air? Sure. But why should it have
to?
Going for the gold there with the
rhetorical questions today, I see. Sony doesn’t have to produce more shows.
But the show’s kind of good—as you attest! So why the hell not?
Community
was a great show, one of the best of its era. But new shows—sometimes from the
same people—will rise up to take its place. They always do.
Do you hear the throbbing drums, the vaguely “exotic”
background singers? They’re swelling and
rising. Yes, I hear it now—it’s “the
circle of life”! And it moves us
all! It’s the circle, the circle of TV
sitcoms!
Yes, look for Community
in the grass. It will filter and fibre
the blood of new brilliant sitcoms like NBC’s remake of The Odd Couple starring
Matthew Perry. Because really good
sitcoms are as common as dandelions. And
for a new one to be born an old one has to die.
So off with their heads!
If
it proves to be time to let it go for once and for all, don’t let that be a sad
thing. Let that be, instead, a celebration of all that the show was so good
at—including telling stories about letting things come to a peaceful, natural
end.
Man, you just love endings, don’t you? You’ve been wanting Community to end from the moment it began. Forget the humor and innovation—what you want
is a “peaceful, natural end.” The
essence of all great comedy.
Also, the primary feeling I feel isn’t sadness. It’s anger—anger at reviews like this, and
anger at NBC for cancelling the show.
But far be it for you to even possibly suggest that NBC might have gone
so far as to make a mistake—no, no, Father Network knows best. All’s for the best in this best of all
possible worlds.
For more of the same, here’s
Andy Greenwald.
The
new status quo rolled for a while: Somewhere between Troy leaving on a lake of
lava and Jeff hallucinating himself into a GI Joe cartoon, Community reclaimed
its mantle as the most inventive show on network television as well as the one
most contemptuous of its rules.
Community—still
the most inventive show on television.
Kind of a shame it got cancelled in its prime, huh?
But
eventually there was simply too much entropy to overcome. By the time the final
two episodes aired — one of which was built around the idea of nothing
happening at all — it was hard to avoid the sense that Community
was out of gas. The finale, “Basic Sandwich,” wasn’t just lousy, it was
exhausted.
So let’s get this straight—for 11 of
its 13 episodes. Community was the
most inventive show on television. But
two lousy episodes (which were actually really funny, but whatever) and you’re
convinced that the show is lousy and exhausted?
Two fucking episodes!
Sentiment
aside, where could this show possibly go from here?
Let’s take it to Mars! Strap on the jetpacks, put on the spacesuits,
and shoot that sucker into space!
How ‘bout this—maybe Community
shouldn’t “go” anywhere. Maybe it should
stick around and continue being the “most inventive show on network
television.” High praise, from a certain Andy Greenwald.
Greendale
has been saved, Jeff and Britta separated, and a deadly meteor could strike at
any time. This feels right. Believe me, I understand the desire to pound on Community’s
chest in hopes of a miracle, but sometimes it’s best to give the dead some
dignity.
Let me suggest a more apt conceit: Mr. Community lies on his death bed,
struggling for life. Nefarious doctors
with a peacock logo on their lapels disconnect his life support systems. We all begin our process of mourning. But suddenly: a turn for the better—do we
dare hope for a miracle? No—Andy Greenwald
sheds his mourning weeds, takes out a sledge hammer, and bludgeons the almost
restored Mr. Community to death. And . . . scene!
But Greenwald doesn’t take the cake. No, that honor goes to Ben
Cosman from something called The Wire.
Wednesday
evening, Deadline reported that Hulu was "in
talks" with Sony Pictures TV to bring Community
back from the dead for a post-cancellation season on the streaming service. We
respectfully ask Hulu to not do that.
Don’t save a brilliant show! Please, we beg of you. The Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse will ride
through a blood-red sky, the seventh seal will be opened, and darkness will
descend over the face of the waters.
Community
doesn't need to be revived. This isn't a Freaks and Geeks
situation – Community had five seasons on air, more than most cult
shows, and it isn't as if the show was only now hitting its prime.
No, it’s not just hitting its
prime. It’s in its prime. Or let’s say, for comparison’s sake that Community is in its Seinfeld Season 6 phase—just after its prime. That’s still pretty fucking good.
Sure,
it's one short of its six season hashtag, but that's no more reason to bring it
back than any other Twitter joke. The show left very few story lines unwrapped
at the end of the fifth season. There's no cliffhanger to resolve. This wasn't
a premature death.
Yes, because the only possible reason
for a show to continue is if there’s some serialized plot that needs to be
resolved. Not just that it’s a great
show that’s still going strong. Again,
this is the whole problem with the growth and learning bullshit—comedies don’t
usually have story arcs across episodes.
They’re not going to have cliffhangers.
Don’t judge comedies by the same criteria as fucking True Detective.
A
sixth season on Hulu would be nothing but pandering fan service.
“Fan service” is a term that people keep throwing around
recently, and like most terms that people obsessively throw around, it means
nothing. So, according to you, making
more of a great sitcom is “pandering fan service?”
Boy, that William Shakespeare: Henry IV Part I, fine, but did you have to do a part II? I know audiences like Falstaff and all, but
that’s just pandering fan service.
And James Joyce, didn’t we have our fill of Stephen
Dedalus in Portrait? Did you really need to service your fans
with more of the same in Ulysses?
And
moreover, Community shouldn't be revived. Just because this is the
Internet and we can do that now doesn't mean every show that gets
cancelled while people are still marginally interested in it needs to find a
new home online.
It’s true! How
many shows were cancelled this past year?
A fuck ton. You don’t hear people
clamoring for more Dads, do you? You know why—it fucking sucked. Community,
on the other hand, is really good.
So people want more of it. Is
that so fucking wrong?
And
that's the problem with these post-cancellation revivals, isn't it? How often do
they live up to the hype (see: Arrested Development)?
Far be it for me to point out the most
fucking obvious point in the world here, but kind of a different context
between Community and Arrested Development. Arrested
Development: years go by and the show is resurrected under huge logistical
constraints. Community: basically, if it gets picked up on Hulu, it would just
continue uninterrupted. Exactly the
same.
Giving
fans exactly what they want is the surest way to make nobody care about a sixth
season of Community.
I don’t even know what that means. So providing a sixth season of Community is the surest way for people
not to care about a sixth season? I
don’t know, I kind of think NOT HAVING a sixth season would be a better way for
people not to care about the season.
So
please, Hulu, snuff out this talk right now. Let Community rest. It had
a good run, it was on a decline, it ended when it should have, and no hashtag
can convince us otherwise. At its best, Community was the most creative
and interesting show on television. It won't be the same on Hulu.
Because, why exactly?
The show “was the most creative and interesting show on
television.” But if it’s on Hulu, it
won’t be? Are there structural
constraints about Hulu that will prevent the show from reaching its
potential? Oh, right—that’s the end of
your article. You’re just a fucking
idiot.
But let’s back up a bit.
It had a good run,
it was on a decline, it ended when it should have.
Let’s ignore the fact that the show wasn’t on a decline. Basically, this is the message of all three
of the articles above. In sum: don’t be
upset. Don’t complain. Trust in Dr. Pangloss: All’s for the best in
the best of all possible worlds. Trust
in our corporate overlords: they’re so wise, they’re so benevolent. They know just the right time when every show
should be cancelled. And if the show’s
not actually in decline, well we TV reviewers, as their faithful servants, will
pretend that it was in decline. March in
lockstep, everyone! Criticism, dissent—fuck
that! Just be grateful for what you
have. Don’t ask for more. Those NBC execs, they’re better than us, more
knowledgeable (and oh so competent in building hit shows). Let the CEOs do their jobs, and the TV
critics can just justify their decisions.
TV “criticism”? I think not.