It’s the moment we’ve all been waiting for with a mixture
of apprehension and nausea. You thought
Steve Heisler couldn’t have topped the
nonsensical sentence from his last Parks and Rec recap? Well, Steve has outdone
himself. All bow before the single
dumbest—and yet also most revealing—sentence yet written on that great
repository of cultural wisdom, the Onion AV Club.
Our setting: another vacuous review of Parks and Rec
Our time: The present (or, about twelve days ago)
Our hero: The resolute Steve Heisler, pressing on deeper
into the Woods of Banality and setting off across the Prairies of
Incomprehension.
In his tried-and-true method of cultural analysis, Steve
is in the midst of a digression on the groundbreaking idea that “luck truly is residue of good design.” (missing definite article there, n’est
pas?). Steve Heisler’s next recap:
“Watched pot never boils.” Or: “An apple
a day keeps doctor away.”
Steve lauds the ability of (fictional character) Leslie
Knope to be a catalyst to her friends (also fictional characters):
As
the episode wisely points out, Leslie Knope is responsible for bringing every
single person into that room, at that exact moment. These kinds of things
happen every day. We just so happened to have witnessed the beginning of this
unstoppable chain of events, and it was called “Pilot.”
Ok—banal, but not totally objectionable. Now prepare yourself. Deep breath.
Gird up your loins. Steve Heisler
is about to speak to you from out of the whirlwind.
Really,
though, it’s the writers who set things in motion and have gotten out of their
way, only stepping in when absolutely necessary. “Leslie And Ben” is some of
their finest work.
I know I keep writing this, but the TV “criticism” just
keeps getting worse: this is the dumbest sentence I have ever read.
According to Steve, what the writers of a TV program do
are “set things in motion” and then get out of the characters’ way, “only
stepping in when absolutely necessary.”
Steve, maybe you mean some notion of modernist impersonality, Joyce’s idea
of the artist who has “refined himself out of existence” in the process of writing
a novel. Oh, wait. You don’t.
You have no idea what you’re talking about.
The way I see it, there are two things you could mean
here. (It’s made particularly difficult by your complete failure, here or
previously, to have clear pronoun references.
Who the fuck are “their”?)
Option A: You think the show is improvised. That the writers set up the situation, and
then step aside while Amy Poehler and Rob Lowe make up their lines. But, of course, that’s not true. This isn’t Curb. It’s scripted. And you know that. So I’m afraid that what you mean is:
Option B: YOU ACTUALLY BELIEVE THESE ARE REAL PEOPLE!
According to you, a writer is like Dr. Frankenstein. He/she actually goes to a graveyard, hires a
hunchbacked assistant, experiments with electricity, and pieces together a
Leslie Knope. Once she’s up on her feet,
the writer gets out of her way. Lets her
live her life. Grow and change and
evolve and all those wonderful, unfunny things that everyone at the AV Club
seems to love. Occasionally he/she steps
in to help out, maybe scripting some speeches for particularly memorable
occasions, but then he/she steps away and the Knopes can go back to their
quiet, happy life.
You know, Steve, I like this—you’ve come right out and
stated what’s at the core of all the AV Club reviews. A creeping Quixote-like compulsion that
refuses to acknowledge that most basic of English 101 facts: that all of the
“people” we might encounter in a book or a TV show are just words on a page and
images on a screen. They aren’t
real. They don’t live outside the words
and situations scripted for them by the writers. If the writers stepped aside, all you would
see up there on your flat screen would be dead air. Is that what you want?
It’s hard, Steve, I know.
Parks looks like a
documentary, with the direct-address interviews, etc. So it’s tempting to think of Ron Swanson as a
real-life meat lover, living in the (fictional) town of Pawnee, Indiana and making
up for the mistakes of his past with a new, more fulfilling relationship. It is tempting. But only if you’re an idiot.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.